business partners

We are starting a business together but one person is investing more

Started by clockwork_llama • November 01, 2026 • 16 replies
clockwork_llama

So my buddy and I are finally doing the thing. LLC paperwork is ready. But he's putting in like 80% of the startup cash and I'm putting in 20% plus doing most of the daily operations. How do people usually structure this without it turning into a weird power dynamic? Neither of us wants to be the "boss" but someone has to make calls eventually.

pixelated_penguin

You need an operating agreement that spells out decision-making, not just profit split. Otherwise the money guy wins every argument by default.

halfbaked_henry

80/20 split but you're doing the work? Sounds like you you're about to be an unpaid employee with extra steps.

grumpy_sourdough

Honestly the split doesn't matter as much as what happens when one of you wants out. Buy-sell clause. Look it up before yu sign anything.

clockwork_llama

Yeah the operating agreement is the piece we're stuck on. We both agree on 80/20 profit but he thinks capital should equal control. I think sweat should count fot something.

halfbaked_henry

It should. But it usually doesn't in practice. Trust me I've ben the sweat guy.

NettleTea

Put a vesting schedule on your sweat equity. That way if you bail after 3 months you don't walk with a chunk of his 80%.

pixelated_penguin

yep, vesting + clear roles. also who is on the bank account? both signers or just him?

grumpy_sourdough

"we don't want to be the boss" is the most dangerous sentence in a new partnership.

clockwork_llama

Oof. Fair. We talked last night and agreed on: he handles capital and financial decisions above a threshold, I handle day-to-day ops and hiring. Neither of us can spend over $1k without the other. Is that dumb?

halfbaked_henry

That's actually more structure than most people have. But $1k is tiny if you're buying equipment. You'll be asking permission for a laptop.

NettleTea

The threshold should be a % of monthly revenue, not a fixed number. Or at least review it every quarter.

pixelated_penguin

also put a deadlock breaker in there. if you can't agree, mediator or a tiebreak process. otherwise you just built a stalemate machine.

halfbaked_henry

the number of people in this thread who clearly learned this from one bad experience is hilarious. and accurate.

clockwork_llama

Deadlock breaker is smart. He's actually the one who brought up vesting first so maybe we're less doomed than this thread thinks.

grumpy_sourdough

Still get a lawyer to look at the agreement. Not your cousin's friend who "knows contracts."

NettleTea

Honestly if you both agreed on vesting without being told to, you're probably fine. The 80/20 will be the least of your problem once you're arguing over the color of the logo.

Join the conversation

Log in or register to reply to this discussion.